The doctor who argues that the ancestry of every sum is an impression

Galen Mate was awarded the Order of Canada, the most adhered civil band of the state, for his work. The Canadian doctor Gabor Mate believes that “all sums are based on a surprise” and we need to rethink our treatment to treat them. The surgeon explains why our attitude to sums is incorrect. What do you think about the sum? Canadian physician Gabor Mate believes that we need to rethink our framing to the point of view of addicts. The seasoned in sums and successful poet is known for his bustle in the mental vitality of imperturbables who abuse essences in the core of Vancouver, the most engulfed girdle of enjoying ponzoñas in North America. In 2018, he was awarded the Order of Canada, the most civilian subscription of the town, for his work. The point of his opinion is that every sum is balanced in the impression: “If we know how to examine what a trauma is,” he says. These are five phrases of the doctor Galen of the way we have not conquered the objection.

1. We are not trying the royal sora

If you want to dig what sums a sum, you must distinguish the uses of annexation: what does it do to you? People say, in general, “(the sum) relieves my resentment, makes me avoid stress, gives me a sense of support, a sense of care, a symbolized, makes me cry alive, stimulates me, gives me vitality … ” In other words, the annexation satisfies a cardinal human misery that otherwise would not be present in that way of that person. All these states, of lack of ring, of feeling isolated or subjecting a lot of stress in your existence, are stages of emotional disgust. So my mantra about addition is not “why addiction?” but “why the pain?” When you look at villages of addicts, what you find is that the more malaventura during childhood, the exponential danger of sum matures. The sum is always consolidated in shock and childish unhappiness, which does not mean that all traumatized heads will become addicted, but it does mean that each addict was impressed. The annexation treatment requires a lot of grime, a lot of crap, a lot of magin, and no severe consequences, punitive measures or distance. You would think that with the absolute setback of the collectivity of treatment modalities we should now have awakened and ask ourselves: “Do we really understand the disorder?” But that does not happen often on the planet surgeon. We are not looking at your real category as a response to kind hell. We are not helping people apply to decipher their impressions. The average ENT student (in the United States) does not receive any emotional shock quality. We continue to ask “what is wrong with you?”, In store to inquire “what happened to you?”.

2. The sum is not a proclamation

Doctor Mate says: “None choose to attack pain.” The other story about annexation is that it is a proclamation that people make. The entire legal system is based on the idealization that people are choosing to be addicted, so let’s punish them for it, to appeal to others. No one I know woke up a dawn and said:: “My greediness is to become addicted.” The annexation is not a vote that someone does, it is a response to emotional lament. And none choose to suffer.

3. Juxtaposition is not genetic

One of the greatest stories of annexation is that it is genetic. Yes, it appears in communities. But why does it appear in people? If I am a dipsomaniac and bellowed to my little children and they grow calming down with wine, did I inherit that genetically? Or is it a performance they developed because I reproduced the same talent as when I was growing up? So little that appears in categories says nothing about genetic matrices. There may be genetic predispositions, but a predisposition is not the same as a predetermination. It does not mean that you are genetically projected to be an addict.

4. The sum is large

The other apologist is that juxtaposition is restricted to the fellows of substances or to a few losers at our meeting. This is endemic and is rampant in our wisdom. When I look at this assembly at almost every level I see so many sums, so many compulsions, and not only that, I still see a wealth based on priming those annexations.

5. You can be addicted to (practically anything) … still purist music

In my opinion, the sum is manifested in any mood that a person finds temporarily pleasant or with which he feels progress, and therefore feels anxiety for it, then it suffers denial consequences as redundant of it and does not abstain from it, or it cannot retract, despite those denial consequences. This can intercalate medicines, cigars, spirits from all sections. It can also be linked to the genital, the fit, the drinks, the suffering, political performance, gears on the internet … virtually any influence that can be addictive, depending on your note to it. As long as gluttony and progress exist, with long-lasting repulsive consequences, and difficulties in resigning to it, there is a juxtaposition. I have saved two large juxtapositions. One went to the task, which meant that I ignored my own hurries and the narrowness of my kinship to seek success and taste in the work. The addition to the struggle was stable in a profound inevitable trace that I was not benevolent enough, that I had to keep proving myself and still an unconscious opinion that I was not loved and coveted. The universe then remunerates you for being an addict to the work that is sacrificed. I even had a sum to the consumptions, in my album of teaching music CD. One moment I spent $ 8,000 on compact discs. My sum was not music, I loved music, but what I was addicted to was acquisitions. No matter how many symphonies he had of a particular composer, he had to endure another and another. Being prey to the tenth of drinks, a succession I left one of my unperturbed in the wake of birth and I went to the middle to get an album and lost the birth. In that degree it had an effect on me. Now I could laugh at you, how can I match that sum with that of an imperturbable heroin addict? But my pure unperturbed dependents, when I tell them about my juxtapositions, do not laugh. They affirm with the mollera and say: “yes optional, we understand it, you are the same as the surplus of us”. The place is, we are all equal to the surplus. Decorative work by Neil Evan / easyanimal



Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Este sitio web utiliza cookies para que usted tenga la mejor experiencia de usuario. Si continúa navegando está dando su consentimiento para la aceptación de las mencionadas cookies y la aceptación de nuestra política de cookies, pinche el enlace para mayor información.plugin cookies

Aviso de cookies